The Library of Congress > Linked Data Service > BIBFRAME Works

Bibframe Work

Title
The distortionary effects of government procurement distortionary effects of government procurement
Type
Text
Genre Form
electronic resource
Language
English
Classification
LCC: HB1 (Source: dlc)
Identified By
Lccn: 2005615814
Summary
"The federal-state Medicaid program insures 43 million people for virtually all of the prescription drugs approved by the FDA. To determine the price that it will pay for a drug treatment, the government uses the average price in the private sector for that same drug. Assuming that Medicaid recipients are unresponsive to price because of the program's zero co-pay, this rule will increase prices for non-Medicaid consumers. Using drug utilization and expenditure data for the top 200 drugs in 1997 and in 2002, we investigate the relationship between the Medicaid market share (MMS) and the average price of a prescription. Our findings suggest that the Medicaid rules substantially increase equilibrium prices for non-Medicaid consumers. Specifically, a ten percentage-point increase in the MMS is associated with a ten percent increase in the average price of a prescription. This result is robust to the inclusion of controls for a drug's therapeutic class, the existence of generic competition, the number of brand competitors, and the years since the drug entered the market. We also demonstrate that the Medicaid rules increase a firm's incentive to introduce new versions of a drug at higher prices and find empirical evidence in support of this for drugs that do not face generic competition. Taken together, our findings suggest that government procurement can have an important effect on equilibrium prices in the private sector"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Authorized Access Point
Duggan, Mark. distortionary effects of government procurement
Authorized Access Point Variant
Scott Morton, Fiona. distortionary effects of government procurement
National Bureau of Economic Research. distortionary effects of government procurement