The Library of Congress > Linked Data Service > BIBFRAME Works

Bibframe Work

Title
Why China did not have a renaissance - and why that matters
Type
Text
Monograph
Subject
Renaissance (LCSH)
China--History--Ming dynasty, 1368-1644 (LCSH)
HISTORY / Renaissance (BISACSH)
HISTORY / Asia / General (BISACSH)
HISTORY / Asia / China (BISACSH)
HISTORY / Europe / General (BISACSH)
HISTORY / Europe / Western (BISACSH)
HISTORY / Study & Teaching (BISACSH)
HISTORY / Modern / General (BISACSH)
Language
English
Illustrative Content
Illustrations
Geographic Coverage
China
Classification
LCC: CB361 .M28 2018
DDC: 909/.4 full
HIS037020
HIS003000
HIS008000
HIS010000
HIS010020
HIS035000
HIS037030
Could not render: bf:status
Supplementary Content
bibliography
index
Content
text
Summary
"Concepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.<br />Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the "Renaissance." Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the "Renaissance" in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as "r/Renaissances," studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.<br />While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as "Renaissance" can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences"-- Provided by publisher.
"This book takes the form of an interdisciplinary dialogue on periodization in global history. Focusing on the Renaissance, the aim is to question whether, when and how periodization schemes, which invariably reveal specific historical and cultural leanings, can fruitfully be applied outside of their "place of first occurrence." The analytical perspectives offered in the book are supplemented by readings from primary sources"-- Provided by publisher.
Table Of Contents
Europe: Secularizing teleological models / Thomas Maissen
China: Engendering teleological models / Barbara Mittler
The view from Europe: The Renaissance / Thomas Maissen
The view from China: r/Renaissances / Barbara Mittler.
Authorized Access Point
Maissen, Thomas, 1962- Why China did not have a renaissance - and why that matters